Genesis: Was there a Flood?

Genesis Chapters 7 and 8

Almost all cultures have some type of “flood” story but the Bible is the only version that explains the flood in terms of man’s sin.  In most cultures, the flood is the result of the gods being bored with, or tiring of, man.  See Britannica Encyclopedia for more information on flood stories from different cultures.

Critics point to The Epic of Gilgamesh (written during the Sumer Empire) as being the source for the biblical Flood.  I had never heard of The Epic of Gilgamesh until I began this study.  Apparently, it is one of the classic epics, even pre-dating Homer.  If you enjoy reading ancient texts, here is a link to the Penguin Classic on Amazon. Kindle copies are also available.

How long was the Flood?

How long did the Flood last?  Many scholars interpret the 40 days and 40 nights as symbolic rather than actual time, especially since the number 40 indicates completeness in Middle Eastern cultures.  The same has been said of the 150 days.  It is merely an approximation. 

I tried to put together a time line for the Flood, but I couldn’t quite get the numbers to add up.  There is a timeline based on months and another based on days.  And of course, there is the question of how many days were in a biblical month. 

  • Flood started in the 2nd month and 17th day of year 1
  • Flood ended in the 2nd month and 27th day of year 2
Months of Flood

If I look at the months and if we assume an average of 30 days per month, the total days come to 371.

Days of Rain

Some scholars suggest that the 150 days of flood waters and the 150 days before the Ark rested should be viewed as the same 150 days, which makes the flood 244 days long.  Some timelines include the first 40 days in the first 150 days, which makes the flood 354 days long. 

If I look at the days, I calculate 394 days. So which is it 371, 394, 244 or 354?

Dr. Danny R. Faulkner gives a comprehensive discussion of how the length of the flood has been calculated in his article How Long Did the Flood Last? He concludes with the following statement:

“What difference does it make how long the Flood was? Ultimately, it matters relatively little. However, from time to time we are asked about the Flood’s duration, and it behooves us to offer the best answer. . . . However, to dogmatically state that “The Flood was x days long” elevates one’s opinion, and it ignores the fact that others with an equal commitment to the authority of Scripture have reached different conclusions. ”

I have to admit it was nice to come across an article where the author was willing to admit that the Bible is not clear on a topic and to suggest a response that begins with “I think.”

Genesis: Noah

Genesis 5

What value can a list of names I can’t even pronounce possible have?

Well . . . various scholars have used the genealogy in chapter 5 to determine a date for the flood and creation. Their calculations are based on the assumption that the genealogy in Chapter 5 is a complete and accurate listing of all generations between Adam and Noah.

Is that assumption correct enough to have become “fact”?

Some Bibles call Chapter 5 Adam’s Descendants to Noah, Adam’s Descendants, or something similar. Those titles imply that the listing is complete. However, the original writings didn’t include those headings; the writings didn’t even have chapters.

So, who decided that the genealogical listing in Chapter 5 could be used as an accurate estimate of the time between Adam and Noah?

James Ussher, 1581-1656, created what is known as the Ussher Chronology, which continues to be the basis for the literalists position on the date of creation. Is there a reason why we still rely on data from the 17th century? Shouldn’t we revisit those century-old assumptions?

Aren’t there still questions to be answered regarding the timeline? Questions like:

  • Do Adam’s 930 years include the time spent in the Garden?
  • How does Enoch’s life factor into the equation, if he never died?
  • Did any of the “other sons and daughters” live longer than those mentioned in Chapter 5?
  • Is the listing complete?

My biggest question is why are Christians fighting over the accuracy of the Biblical timeline?

Any timeline is based on assumptions. Assumptions that Chapter 5 is a complete and accurate genealogy from Adam to Noah. Yet, the author of Genesis doesn’t claim that the genealogy is complete and makes no statements as to who was or was not included in the listing. The author only claims to provide the genealogy for one branch of Adam’s family tree. How do other branches of Adam’s family tree impact the timeline of Chapter 5?

Is one person’s assumption better than another’s?

I get how people could read Chapter 5 as THE timeline between Adam and Noah. I also see how that timeline is based on a few assumptions. What I don’t see is the need for believers to condemn other believers who do not share the same assumptions. Haven’t we lost sight of the message in our drive to be right?